Alps Technology ATI-S572-180 vs APOS Energy AS180
Peak power: Alps Technology ATI-S572-180 180 Wp, APOS Energy AS180 180 Wp. The APOS Energy AS180 is better on 3 of 5 comparable points.
Who wins where
- Alps Technology ATI-S572-180
- APOS Energy AS180
Biggest differences
| Fact | ATI-S572-180 | AS180 |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature coefficient Pmax | -0.51 %/°C | -0.43 %/°C |
| Efficiency | 14 % | 13.4 % |
| Nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) | 49.9 °C | 47.8 °C |
| PTC power rating | 155.7 W | 161.2 W |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1000 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | Alps TechnologyATI-S572-180 | APOS EnergyAS180 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Cell type | Monocrystalline 1 | Monocrystalline 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Peak power | 180 Wp 1 | 180 Wp 1 |
| PTC power rating | 155.7 W 1 | 161.2 W ✓ 1 |
| Efficiency | ||
| Efficiency | 14 % ✓ 1 | 13.4 % 1 |
| Temperature coefficient Pmax | -0.51 %/°C 1 | -0.43 %/°C ✓ 1 |
| Nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) | 49.9 °C 1 | 47.8 °C ✓ 1 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Width | 820 mm 1 | 1,000 mm 1 |
| Height | 1,570 mm 1 | 1,341 mm 1 |
Sources
- CEC Solar Equipment List – PV modules — California Energy Commission · accessed 27 Sept 2026