Ablytek 6MN6A275 vs BYD 275P6C-36
Peak power: Ablytek 6MN6A275 275 Wp, BYD 275P6C-36 275 Wp. The BYD 275P6C-36 is better on 3 of 5 comparable points.
Who wins where
- Ablytek 6MN6A275
- BYD 275P6C-36
Biggest differences
| Fact | 6MN6A275 | 275P6C-36 |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | 16.9 % | 14.2 % |
| Temperature coefficient Pmax | -0.45 %/°C | -0.41 %/°C |
| Nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) | 47.4 °C | 45.6 °C |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1000 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | Ablytek6MN6A275 | BYD275P6C-36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Cell type | Monocrystalline 1 | Polycrystalline 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Peak power | 275 Wp 1 | 275 Wp 1 |
| PTC power rating | 246.7 W 1 | 250.1 W ✓ 1 |
| Efficiency | ||
| Efficiency | 16.9 % ✓ 1 | 14.2 % 1 |
| Temperature coefficient Pmax | -0.45 %/°C 1 | -0.41 %/°C ✓ 1 |
| Nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) | 47.4 °C 1 | 45.6 °C ✓ 1 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Width | 992 mm 1 | 992 mm 1 |
| Height | 1,640 mm 1 | 1,956 mm 1 |
Sources
- CEC Solar Equipment List – PV modules — California Energy Commission · accessed 27 Sept 2026